Showing posts with label right. Show all posts
Showing posts with label right. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 17, 2013

What if the laws of the United States is based on the Ten Commandments, is actually the law of commandments come from?

tigermotherplot.blogspot.com ® What if the laws of the United States is based on the Ten Commandments, is actually the law of commandments come from?

Uncertainty written by Paxton G: If US laws are based on the Ten Commandments, then how come only two commandments are actually laws?

“Thou shalt not kill”


“Thou shalt not steal”


And how come laws against stealing and killing had been laws since the commandments had been written?


And how come a few of the commandments (“Thou shalt not believe in false gods”, “Thou shall honor thy father and mother”) are illegal to enforce?


It’s really concerning If US laws are based on the Ten Commandments, then how come only two commandments are actually laws? you will preferably should fix dilemmas individually. With a little luck this will help to in lots of ways… and help your own life far better. Needing concerning If US laws are based on the Ten Commandments, then how come only two commandments are actually laws? are generally a remedy over the years.
Optimum solution:


Answer by tonalc2
US laws are not based on the 10 commandments.


Answer by lone butcher Spartan remembers
It’s not based off of the laws themselves, it is based off of morals. Which actually is just the other way around, Christian morals are the same as what this country was founded off of.

Remember, even atheists in that day respected the morals of those that were Christians. Not now though. . .


Answer by Jason J
US law is NOT based on the 10 Commandments. It’s that simple. The 10 Commandments are a set of laws for living peacefully in a society, as are US laws. Of course there are parallels.


Answer by Alex Smirnoff
Because making “You shall not worship false idols” a crime will land 65 millions in jail.


Answer by Wally
Where Did You Hear That U.S. Laws Are Based On The Ten Commandments ?


Answer by Logic
US laws are not based on the ten commandments.


Answer by mrae49
In my opinion, the laws arnt based the commandments. The laws more specifically the bill of rights was based on what rights britian didnt give to america which relly has nothing to do withnthe 10 commandments.


plus most secular people will also agree that killing and stealing is wrong.


and while some may belive that the government is corrupt by religon, they obviously dont see hat s going on in some other countries.


Answer by Carol A
The U.S. was not founded on religious mores but on a secularized system with a strong wall between church and state.


Answer by Andrew K
A) “Bearing false witness” implies slander and libel, so that’s 3 right there.


B) Read the Treaty of Tripoli to determine of the US is a Christian nation. It was in the 1790′s, and was unanimously ratified by the Senate.


Answer by Barrel Bottom
Neither the United States Constitution nor the UCC is based on the 10 commandments.


Mostly based on influences of various philosophers such as Voltaire and John Locke, and British Common Law.


Answer by badspeller
because all others we the americans doing them and love them, but we show some restriction on thous 2


Answer by Peace through blinding force
Who said US law was based on the 10 Commandments?

They manifestly are not.


Answer by Maggie
yes they are in the original cause they are basic principles. some have to do with religion and US wuz made to give people free right in the areas of different religion.


Answer by Sailing
The laws used were considered natural laws given by divine dispensation and were so well known by the people they didn’t have to be written down.


Although the majority of these people believed in a God they respected the different religious beliefs from the different religions.


If you have any interest in the writing of the constitution there is a book titled “The 5000 year Leap”.


Fully grasp far better?

Add your own special answer on the comments!

What if the laws of the United States is based on the Ten Commandments, is actually the law of commandments come from?

Sunday, April 14, 2013

Name maia really mean?

tigermotherplot.blogspot.com ® Name maia really mean?

Request merely by Katy: Does the name Maia really mean this?

I heard multiple places that Maia means brave warrior. It was perfect for my fictional story, until I was verifying name meanings and other places such as babynaming websites said it meant “mother” I am confused and really want to make sure it means brave warrior as to correspond with my story. Thanks!


That is certainly just about Does the name Maia really mean this? that you will really should try to resolve dilemmas independantly. Ideally you will find in lots of ways; and produce your own life far better. In hopes just about Does the name Maia really mean this? are generally a response in coming years.
Optimum solution:


Answer by Bro
To quote:


“In Greek mythology, Maia was the eldest of the Pleiades, the seven daughters of the Titan Atlas. Their beauty moved the hunter Orion to pursue them without rest, and in pity Zeus transformed the sisters into stars. Orion made the transition, too, and every clear night they resume their chase. Maia was also the mother of Hermes, the messenger god.


In Roman tradition, the same name was attributed to an earth goddess, though her identification with the Greek Maia was not consistent. The month of May was named in her honor.


In Maori, it means brave warrior.”


It means different things in different languages. Makes sense, right? It’s a simple combination of sounds. Ma-Ya


Answer by Jon Thamus
Find here some more information.


Figure out much better?

Add the actual answer from the comments!

Name maia really mean?

How to change the minimum firing speed right?

tigermotherplot.blogspot.com ® How to change the minimum firing speed right?

Query created by MadelineChef: how would the minimal launch velocity change?

A small negatively charged particle (mass m, charge -q) is currently at rest at the surface of a large positively and uniformly charged dielectric sphere (radius R, charge density rho). What minimal “launch velocity” v_o should be given to this particle so that it could leave the attracting “mother” sphere to travel to infinitely remote places? If the radius R of the sphere is increased by a factor of 2 (everything else left the same), how would the minimal launch velocity change?


This is certainly just about how would the minimal launch velocity change? which you might really have to solve dilemmas on their own. I really hope this will assist you in lots of ways, that will create yourself much better. Thinking just about how would the minimal launch velocity change? may be an answer over time.
Solution:


Answer by rs
This is the same as escape velocity.


Here is a hint.

Figure out the potential energy at the surface.

At the time the particle escapes, it has zero potential energy due to the charged sphere. I never really has exactly zero, but for all practical purposes, you can assume zero.


Figure out the kinetic energy needed to match the difference in potential energy from the surface to zero.


Be sure much better?

Leave the answer as part of his comments!

How to change the minimum firing speed right?

Saturday, April 13, 2013

You "mom" or "mother" in Japanese How do I tell?

tigermotherplot.blogspot.com ® You "mom" or "mother" in Japanese How do I tell?

Issue made by ♥Puяρℓιcιous♥: How do you say “mom” or “mother” in Japanese?

Also how do u say “shutup”, “i love you”, “what’s up”, and “oh my gosh”.

Please include the pronunciation. Thanks.


Definitely information about How do you say “mom” or “mother” in Japanese? that you’ll would need to clear up situations ourselves. With luck , this will assist you in several ways; in order to make your own life significantly better. Desiring information about How do you say “mom” or “mother” in Japanese? are generally the most efficient into the future.
Optimum solution:


Answer by akdfkalj
http://www.freedict.com/onldict/jap.html


heres an English to Japanese dictionary.


Answer by murphey
mom= okaasan (oh- ka- san)

i love you= isuteru (E- shute- lu)

wats up= ogenki desuka (oh-ge-n-ki- des-ka)

sorry i dont remember what omg was


Answer by happyturtle48
okasan


Answer by lachatnoire
murphy is right


for omg you could say “nan-de” thats spelt wrong btw but you know what i mean. nan-de = what


Answer by yourstruly
I think you should go to the Language section on here, this has nothing to do with Etiquette.


Answer by .::†JUST UR AVERAGE CHO†::.
for some1 elses mom you say “okaasan”,but for your mom,its “haha” and OMG could be like “honto desuka” or “uso”


and whts up can be “ogenki desuka” (it means are you well/how are you)


Be sure greater?

Leave your special answer inside of the comments!

You "mom" or "mother" in Japanese How do I tell?

Always in front of the direct object, indirect object in a sentence?

tigermotherplot.blogspot.com ® Always in front of the direct object, indirect object in a sentence?

Problem basically by alyssa!: Is the indirect object always in front of the direct object in a sentence?

For example, “I sold my mother the cake.” The indirect object would be mother and the direct object would be cake. If I said, “I sold the cake to my mother,” would the indirect object still be mother even if it is after the direct object? Thanks in advance.. my teacher is stupid and cannot explain things herself.


It will be needed to know about Is the indirect object always in front of the direct object in a sentence? that you might want to fix troubles on their own. Perhaps this helps in several ways; and to make your own life considerably better. Who wish needed to know about Is the indirect object always in front of the direct object in a sentence? are generally a fix later on in life.
Solution:


Answer by Gretchen S
If you change it to “I sold the cake to my mother,” the sentence no longer has an indirect object; “to my mother” is a prepositional phrase, and “mother” is the object of the preposition “to.”


The meaning is exactly the same, but the grammar parts have a different name/label.


This holds true for all of these examples:


I gave her the gift/I gave the gift to her

Tell me the story/Tell the story to me

He bought her a diamond/He bought a diamond for her


Answer by Ann Kamen
Yes, some (teachers) are just as you say. Anyway,


in your second sentence, you do not have an indirect object, BECAUSE “mother”

is now the object of the PREPOSITION “to,” while “cake” remains the direct

object.


Now, if you want to get really dramatic with something like this:

I gave him all that I had…

You might say,

All that I had I gave him.

In both sentences, HIM is indirect object and ALL is the d.o. (never mind about

I HAD right now–it’s something else–or if you wish, just say,


ALL (emphasis!) I gave him (that so and so)!


Know a lot better?

Add your ultimate answer in their comments!

Always in front of the direct object, indirect object in a sentence?

Blog Archive